Barber proposes what he calls a “Global Civic Society”, modeled after the original Articles of Confederation , which preceded our current Constitution. This fallacy is one of the reasons he is so fearful of multinational corporations–he envisions a world that will be run, as in the movie Rollerball , by a few corporations that have replaced the nation-states. However, he means something quite different, and he is quite wrong. Attempts to universalize all these factors are impossible. Government, particularly in the New Deal and Great Society years, became so enormous and extended its reach so far, with our eager acquiescence, that it made many of these institutions seem superfluous. It was the great Albert Jay Nock who perhaps put this best when he said:
Never mind the fact that the U. For instance, cutting down a jungle will upset the overall oxygen balance, which affects our “global lungs”. Barber describes the solidarity needed within the concept of Jihad as being secured through exclusion and war against outsiders. There was no historical reference for any of this. We must reprivatize education, to get parents back involved in the schools and schools back in the business of providing a moral education with a cultural grounding. The term implied the trading of products but the priority changed to moving production, factories and outsourcing jobs to the cheapest labor markets of the world.
The things that especially bother him are the erosion of the state’s responsibilities, the maniacal rush towards market solutions, the bogus ethical concerns of corporations and the potentially catastrophic competing demands of multiculturalism, as opposed to the mutually beneficial interdependence of pluralism.
There was talk about a new world order after WW1 and somethings were enforced on the losers of that war only to ignite a worst war. How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World is a book by American political scientist Benjamin Barberin which he puts forth a theory that describes the struggle between “McWorld” globalization and the corporate control of the political process and ” Jihad ” Arabic term for “struggle”, here modified to mean tradition and traditional valuesin the form of extreme nationalism or religious orthodoxy and theocracy.
Against this is the argument of those like Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, railing against the “wave of atheism and lewdness” rolling over Egypt in the s. Barber’s understanding of the world that it is hard to know where to begin and impossible to address them all, but we’ll try to take on a few of the bigger misconceptions.
He points out that Islam has no word for “democracy” and has to use the Greek term.
Jihad vs. McWorld – Wikipedia
The concepts of local value added economies tailored to geopolitical regional settings was smashed apart artificially eszay the new “ism” of Globalism and Free Trade. When one size fits all thinking starts controlling these settings, a radical friction is created almost automatically.
Then came steelmakers then oil men then military industrial complex then electronics manufacturers then chemical companies then PC makers then biotech and on and on–each of these seemingly dominant industries left on the scrap heap of history. Instead of thinking global and acting local in a reasonable fashion- step by step- all of sudden the world was rushed into a new world order that has no basis in history.
I say not surprisingly because as a conservative I would have expected this behavior. Not only would it be good for the health of our society, it is likely to make our economy even stronger, as government gives up duties that it has not performed particularly well and hands them back to institutions in the private esasy that have historically been more efficient and successful.
I told you so
If we do desire a culture that is “lovely” we must rehabilitate our badly damaged non-governmental pre-democratic institutions. Recent events have not exactly conspired to overturn its thesis, although one might for the moment feel like reversing the word order, given who has been most visibly on the offensive lately.
Global Democracy or Global Law: David Gergen, editor at large of U. The elder President Bush announced the new world order right about the ve the initiatives of so called Free Trade were activated. These local value added economies were reasonable success stories and the world should have taken notice that there was something good about this approach.
That government is best which governs least. It is going to require nations to become more democratic, more capitalist, more pluralistic, more free, but what will we do with that freedom? Just as size and power did not make for efficient and successful governments, it has not made for efficient and successful corporations.
One hundred years ago, the railroad barons ruled the roost. And who are those stockholders?
Review: Jihad vs McWorld by Benjamin R Barber | Books | The Guardian
Here again we run into one of the ways in which Mr. Barber describes the solidarity needed within the concept of Jihad as being secured through exclusion and war against outsiders. Just as it is we consumers who choose to consume, it is we stockholders who choose what it is that companies mcwprld, how they market these products, how they are run. The working poor classes are now finding out that they can no longer even afford to buy the cheaper imports while the destitute working jjhad who make the products can not afford essya buy the very things they make let alone have any money left over to buy the things the USA and other nations have left to sell.
The Politics of Education: Barber assumes that this consumerism is somehow imposed from above by all-powerful multinational corporations that manipulate the people, Mr. I continue to edsay that Britain has discovered at least jjhad part of the secret of how to elude both Jihad and McWorld, and recreate in the global arena the tradition of rebellion and liberty, of democracy and the limits on democracy, that has fashioned its own liberal tradition.
But that has been a result of the demands of the consumers and, ultimately, of the decisions of stockholders, of democracy in action, however ugly that action may be. Not surprisingly, at a time when the livin’ was easy, other concerns–the political, the cultural, etc.
The term implied the trading of products but the priority changed to moving production, factories and outsourcing jobs to the cheapest labor markets of the world.
Barber believes, nearly all of these measures involve reducing the role and importance of government in our lives. There are regional settings with individual needs needing to be balanced accordingly.
Benjamin Barber deflates the four myths of democracy.